The LA Times reports:
In a 6-3 vote, justices say human rights advocates can be prosecuted if they advise members of a foreign terrorist group, even if they urge them to settle their disputes through peaceful means.
[snip]
The law had been challenged on free-speech grounds by several human rights advocates, including USC professor Ralph Fertig. He had worked with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, known as the PKK, an outlawed group which supports independence for the Kurds in Turkey. Fertig said he firmly opposed violence and terrorism, but he believed he should be permitted to advise the groups on resolving its disputes through the United Nations.
[snip]
“We are deeply disappointed,” said David Cole, a lawyer who represented Fertig. “The Court said that the 1st Amendment permits Congress to make it a crime to work for peace and human rights. That is wrong.”
Obama = Bush. No law = no law, but the Congress reads the 1st Amendment to include the hidden meaning that no law means no law except if Congress wants to override your freedom of speech. Then no law means whatever the Supremes want it to mean. You don’t have unalienable rights; the Congress can simply take away whatever it wants. This is an oligarchy of unelected judges doing whatever they decide. The re-interpretation comes after the fact not before.


![[Most Recent Quotes from www.kitco.com]](http://www.kitconet.com/charts/metals/gold/t24_au_en_usoz_2.gif)