<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psychiatry and Money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://laceylibertarian.us/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800</link>
	<description>“Anarchy is the only slight glimmer of hope.” — Mick Jagger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 00:41:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13761</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13761</guid>
		<description>Mark,
Great! A wonderful book. If you were not aware of the following, see also the review by David Gordon (http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=265),  a pre-2004 short essay by Szasz on Rothbard&#039;s criticisms (http://www.szasz.com/rothbardonszasz.html), and Rothbard&#039;s kinder speech from 1980 (http://mises.org/story/2330). At present I cannot locate Rothbard&#039;s original review of The Myth of Mental Illness, but it is there somewhere.
Ted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,<br />
Great! A wonderful book. If you were not aware of the following, see also the review by David Gordon (<a href="http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=265" rel="nofollow">http://mises.org/misesreview_detail.aspx?control=265</a>),  a pre-2004 short essay by Szasz on Rothbard&#8217;s criticisms (<a href="http://www.szasz.com/rothbardonszasz.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.szasz.com/rothbardonszasz.html</a>), and Rothbard&#8217;s kinder speech from 1980 (<a href="http://mises.org/story/2330" rel="nofollow">http://mises.org/story/2330</a>). At present I cannot locate Rothbard&#8217;s original review of The Myth of Mental Illness, but it is there somewhere.<br />
Ted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13759</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 17:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13759</guid>
		<description>Ted,

Thanks. I&#039;ve just ordered a copy of &quot;Faith in Freedom&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>Thanks. I&#8217;ve just ordered a copy of &#8220;Faith in Freedom&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13755</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 07:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13755</guid>
		<description>Mark,

In Faith in Freedom, Szasz shows that Mill, Rand, Mises, Hayek and Nozick make the same basic mistake, while Rothbard reaches the right conclusion by way of a different route.

Ted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>In Faith in Freedom, Szasz shows that Mill, Rand, Mises, Hayek and Nozick make the same basic mistake, while Rothbard reaches the right conclusion by way of a different route.</p>
<p>Ted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: R G Sullivan, MS, MD</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13733</link>
		<dc:creator>R G Sullivan, MS, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:54:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13733</guid>
		<description>I agree with many of the observations so far noted.  it is always interesting to read the reasons people dislike psychiatry and psychiatric treatments.  I agree that psychiatric diagnoses and medications are frequently misused, However they can be remarkably effective when used in a judicious manner.  The key to  this is TIME and the development of a reasonable collaborative connection between the doctor and the patient (and family).  Unfortunately, the current &quot;business&quot; of medicine does not facilitate this kind of medical care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with many of the observations so far noted.  it is always interesting to read the reasons people dislike psychiatry and psychiatric treatments.  I agree that psychiatric diagnoses and medications are frequently misused, However they can be remarkably effective when used in a judicious manner.  The key to  this is TIME and the development of a reasonable collaborative connection between the doctor and the patient (and family).  Unfortunately, the current &#8220;business&#8221; of medicine does not facilitate this kind of medical care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobby Newman</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13732</link>
		<dc:creator>Bobby Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 14:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13732</guid>
		<description>:clap: I agree with what Mark and Amy have to say 1000 percent. I am a former college athlete,(full ride scholarship football player) who wanted a degree in coaching, was exposed to three semesters of psychology and realized it was a scam.I later became addicted to drugs (not a result of the psychology) but when looking for treatment would not conform to the traditional forms of psychological treatment because I knew it was bogus. Since graduating the Narconon program 8 years ago and since having lectured to over 130,000 kids in 6 states about drugs, it is very difficult because of all the false information kids are receiving from &quot;professionals&quot;. Kids hear, &quot;take these drugs,they are good (amphetamines-Adderall/Ritalin) and but those are bad&quot;, and kids are confused. Adderall is now the number one abused drug in Universities across the country, then you have direct to consumer advertising and people tell their doctors what drug is needed for what ailment. For more information you can also go to www.drugawareness.org, www.breggin.com and www.mindfreedom.org.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>:clap: I agree with what Mark and Amy have to say 1000 percent. I am a former college athlete,(full ride scholarship football player) who wanted a degree in coaching, was exposed to three semesters of psychology and realized it was a scam.I later became addicted to drugs (not a result of the psychology) but when looking for treatment would not conform to the traditional forms of psychological treatment because I knew it was bogus. Since graduating the Narconon program 8 years ago and since having lectured to over 130,000 kids in 6 states about drugs, it is very difficult because of all the false information kids are receiving from &#8220;professionals&#8221;. Kids hear, &#8220;take these drugs,they are good (amphetamines-Adderall/Ritalin) and but those are bad&#8221;, and kids are confused. Adderall is now the number one abused drug in Universities across the country, then you have direct to consumer advertising and people tell their doctors what drug is needed for what ailment. For more information you can also go to <a href="http://www.drugawareness.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.drugawareness.org</a>, <a href="http://www.breggin.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.breggin.com</a> and <a href="http://www.mindfreedom.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.mindfreedom.org</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Philo</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13731</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Philo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 06:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13731</guid>
		<description>You know what is sicker than pushing bipolar meds on children? Pushing antipsychotic meds on pregnant women, nursing mothers, etc. And this is exactly what is going on right now in our government, with GRANTS being potentially given out to nonprofits and others if they will enforce the screening, drugging, hospitalization, and &quot;case management&quot; and &quot;ensuring the safety of the child&quot; for women considered AT RISK FOR depression or psychosis during and after pregnancy. And who likes to participate in putting women on antipsychotics? Mothering Magazine and Dr. Thomas Hale, Postpartum Support International, The ACOG, etc. etc. etc. Google The MOTHERS Act or go to www.uniteforlife.org

These drugs kill babies in the womb and after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know what is sicker than pushing bipolar meds on children? Pushing antipsychotic meds on pregnant women, nursing mothers, etc. And this is exactly what is going on right now in our government, with GRANTS being potentially given out to nonprofits and others if they will enforce the screening, drugging, hospitalization, and &#8220;case management&#8221; and &#8220;ensuring the safety of the child&#8221; for women considered AT RISK FOR depression or psychosis during and after pregnancy. And who likes to participate in putting women on antipsychotics? Mothering Magazine and Dr. Thomas Hale, Postpartum Support International, The ACOG, etc. etc. etc. Google The MOTHERS Act or go to <a href="http://www.uniteforlife.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.uniteforlife.org</a></p>
<p>These drugs kill babies in the womb and after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13730</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13730</guid>
		<description>I agree, based on my experience in med school, that many of the med students who went into psychiatry did so because they wanted &quot;to figure themselves out&quot;. But there&#039;s nothing wrong with that. The dogma used to be that you couldn&#039;t really be a good shrink unless you understood yourself first. I don&#039;t know what the dogma is now (or even if one exists) but, if it does exist, it probably relates to (1) how well you know the DSM-IV and can squeeze people into some kind of diagnosis, (2) how good you are at handing out pills, and (3) how good you are at giving injections. Actually, you will delegate the last 2 responsibilities to Nurse Ratched.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, based on my experience in med school, that many of the med students who went into psychiatry did so because they wanted &#8220;to figure themselves out&#8221;. But there&#8217;s nothing wrong with that. The dogma used to be that you couldn&#8217;t really be a good shrink unless you understood yourself first. I don&#8217;t know what the dogma is now (or even if one exists) but, if it does exist, it probably relates to (1) how well you know the DSM-IV and can squeeze people into some kind of diagnosis, (2) how good you are at handing out pills, and (3) how good you are at giving injections. Actually, you will delegate the last 2 responsibilities to Nurse Ratched.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13729</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13729</guid>
		<description>Ted,

Can you be a little clearer? Which libertarians (specific names not necessary) are you talking about and in what way are they wrong? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted,</p>
<p>Can you be a little clearer? Which libertarians (specific names not necessary) are you talking about and in what way are they wrong? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libertarian</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13728</link>
		<dc:creator>Libertarian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 01:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13728</guid>
		<description>My younger brother is a psychiatrist, and he&#039;s nuttier than a fruitcake.  I think guys and gals choose psychiatry in after med school to try and figure themselves out.  They ain&#039;t playin&#039; with a full deck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My younger brother is a psychiatrist, and he&#8217;s nuttier than a fruitcake.  I think guys and gals choose psychiatry in after med school to try and figure themselves out.  They ain&#8217;t playin&#8217; with a full deck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800&#038;cpage=1#comment-13727</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://laceylibertarian.us/?p=1800#comment-13727</guid>
		<description>Agreed. But why, may I ask, do you think that libertarians are so often wrong on this issue?
Ted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. But why, may I ask, do you think that libertarians are so often wrong on this issue?<br />
Ted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
